1) Chrysler was kept alive by bailout.
2) Jobs will be union (per UAW contract).
3) Kasich is a Teabagging Koch-sucker and therefore anti-bailout, anti-union (see also SB5).
4) Kasich has absolutely no problem trying to take credit for this job creation, which is the direct result of and results in things he and his party and their backers are opposed to.
Therefore, Kasich is the world's biggest hypocrite.
Comments ... #
Did he do any work on tax incentives for Chrysler to keep that project in Ohio?
posted by Linecrosser on Nov 19, 2011 at 12:26:04 am #
Err state tax incentives.
posted by Linecrosser on Nov 19, 2011 at 12:26:24 am #
Unions have ruined Toledo, the Midwest, America. They ruined it.
posted by OmarLittle on Nov 19, 2011 at 09:34:31 am #
Unions have ruined Toledo, the Midwest, America. They ruined it.
Keep on posting those TeaOP lies! They might even give you a banana sticker if you post them enough!
posted by anonymouscoward on Nov 19, 2011 at 11:20:15 am #
End public dollars for all private companies.
posted by dbw8906 on Nov 19, 2011 at 02:03:26 pm # 1 person liked this
End public dollars for all private companies.
Yeah, you too, keep trying for the banana stickers.
posted by anonymouscoward on Nov 20, 2011 at 01:05:37 am #
That's rights right AC it's only bad for government to hand out money if they don't vote for your candidate. Crony capitalism is only bad when people with "R's" after their name are involved right?
You point out the failure of the 99%'ers. Well played.
"End public dollars for all private companies" includes Medicare/Medicaid, if you think about it. So sorry for pointing out you Teabaggers and your simplistic Teabag Talking Points are full of FAIL.
posted by anonymouscoward on Nov 20, 2011 at 12:08:39 pm #
How does that end Medcare/Medicaid? isn't that a payment for services rendered and not a loan or investment?
Not sure if I understand the correlation?
posted by shamrock44 on Nov 20, 2011 at 12:32:14 pm #
Re: AC's latest comment--
San Jose State University: Straw Man
Why are politicians always so willing to tell you what the other side thinks? One reason is that, in explaining someone else's views, we have a chance to oversimplify and even falsify them.....that is the purpose of this technique, which we call "straw man" (like a scarecrow) because it relies on the creation of a false image of someone else's statements, ideas, or beliefs.
Wikipedia: Straw man
A straw man is a component of an argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position, twisting his words or by means of [false] assumptions.
To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.
Generally, the straw man is a highly exaggerated or over-simplified version of the opponent's original statement, which has been distorted to the point of absurdity. This exaggerated or distorted statement is thus easily argued against, but is a misrepresentation of the opponent's actual statement.
posted by oldhometown on Nov 20, 2011 at 12:38:26 pm #
The man with the strident voice was still talking remorselessly away...
It was just a noise, a quack-quack-quacking...
This was not a real human being but some kind of dummy.
It was not the man's brain that was speaking, it was his larynx.
The stuff that was coming out of him consisted of words,
but it was not speech in the true sense:
it was noise uttered in unconsciousness,
like the quacking of a duck.
George Orwell
Sounds like a duck...
Login or create an account to post a comment.