http://gawker.com/5867388/fox-news-chartmakers-continue-to-poorly-redefine-mathematics
vs.
Shame on FOX News... again.
created by toledolen_ on Dec 12, 2011 at 09:27:43 pm Politics Comments: 61Comments ... #
Which, of course works for the more uniformed.
Fox News Viewers Uninformed, NPR Listeners Not, Poll Suggests
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-uninformed-npr-listeners-not-poll-suggests/
Fox News Viewers Know Less Than People Who Don't Watch Any News: Study
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-less-informed-people-fairleigh-dickinson_n_1106305.html
posted by toledolen_ on Dec 12, 2011 at 09:32:42 pm #
I guess I should be honest with the troops. Christmas is likely to happen again this year. Once again we will have failed to carry out the wishes of the dark lord, Soros.
Rest and regroup for next year's War On Christmas! Fox usually announces its beginning in June or so.
posted by SensorG on Dec 12, 2011 at 10:15:41 pm # 1 person liked this
:: looks at graphic, looks at numbers.... hey looks fi....WAIT A MINUTE, WHY THE FUCK DOESN'T THAT GRAPH TAKE A BIG DIP AT THE END?!?!
Now watch as the ToledoTalk TeaTards REFUSE to even acknowledge this thread. There will not be one "mea culpa" from a single one of them. They'll just blame the fuck-up on an "overzealous staffer of Fox News" or some other stupidity, which neatly ignores all the other deliberate "mistakes" in FNC graphics and every single time a "liberal" Republican or one that was in trouble got tagged with a (D) instead of an (R).
Come on TTTTs, prove you have gonads (even if they're smaller than the width of an electron) and say "yeah, Fox News is being deliberately misleading and we acknowledge it, and no, it's not okay nor does everyone else do it."
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 12, 2011 at 11:12:33 pm #
And while I'm at it:
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/fox-news-management-fed-up-by-mistakes_b17529
Effective immediately, there is zero tolerance for on-screen errors. Mistakes by any member of the show team that end up on air may result in immediate disciplinary action against those who played significant roles in the “mistake chain,” and those who supervise them. That may include warning letters to personnel files, suspensions, and other possible actions up to and including termination, and this will all obviously play a role in performance reviews. So we now face a great opportunity to review and improve on our workflow and quality control efforts.
That's from 2009. So how's that zero tolerance for on-screen mistakes working out? It's not a mistake when you can look at a goddamn graph from the SOURCE OF THE STATISTICS and see the sharp curve at the end! Or when you can punch the numbers into Excel and make a graph too!
This shit is not a mistake, it's deliberately done to keep TeaTards like those that infest this board whipped up and angry so they ignore what is really going on.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 12, 2011 at 11:18:58 pm #
anonymouscoward posted at 10:12:33 PM on Dec 12, 2011:
:: looks at graphic, looks at numbers.... hey looks fi....WAIT A MINUTE, WHY THE FUCK DOESN'T THAT GRAPH TAKE A BIG DIP AT THE END?!?!
Now watch as the ToledoTalk TeaTards REFUSE to even acknowledge this thread. There will not be one "mea culpa" from a single one of them. They'll just blame the fuck-up on an "overzealous staffer of Fox News" or some other stupidity, which neatly ignores all the other deliberate "mistakes" in FNC graphics and every single time a "liberal" Republican or one that was in trouble got tagged with a (D) instead of an (R).
Come on TTTTs, prove you have gonads (even if they're smaller than the width of an electron) and say "yeah, Fox News is being deliberately misleading and we acknowledge it, and no, it's not okay nor does everyone else do it."
Anyone else find it ironic that TTs resident flamer, who hides behind a more than appropriate alias, is demanding proof of testicular fortitude?
posted by RBancroft on Dec 12, 2011 at 11:46:02 pm # 2 people liked this
Yeah yeah whatever, someone has to keep the right-wing talking point repeaters from taking over this forum. Truth is I'd be a lot more moderate than I appear but for the fact that Fox News and the GOP consistently do this lying, misleading, racist, sexist, homophobic, you-name-it bullshit that keeps me from being able to actually VOTE for someone who is actually something of a "socially liberal but fiscally conservative" bent... the TeaOP is "socially radically conservative and fiscally moderate to liberal (when it benefits themselves or their friends)" while the Dems are "socially moderate to liberal and fiscally moderate to liberal (unless they are really serious about increasing revenue and cutting defense spending, which would be amazing). Guess which one is the lesser of two evils in my book.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:46:38 am #
So they made a mistake in the graphic...it's not like no one else has ever done the same thing. As to whether or not it was deliberate, you'd have to know the mind of the person who did the graph, which none of us does. In fact, I'll bet no one can even FIND the name of the person who did the graph.
That being said, shame on them if they didn't issue a correction!
Unlike some, I don't want to defend mistakes like this on the right, simply because they're done by the 'right.' I just wish the 'left' felt the same way about mistakes on their side.
But rather than get into a debate about how terrible one of the media outlets is, or whether 'right' or 'left' is correct, can we look at what the numbers represent? If we all worried less about the 'spin' (from BOTH sides) and more about what the facts mean, we'd all be better off.
First, I don't believe ANY president or administration when it comes to such things anymore. The ONLY reason the rate dropped so significantly is because of the number of people no longer being counted.
For example: when you have 100,000 unemployed and 1,000,000 in the workforce, your unemployment rate is 10%.
If half of that 100,000 are no longer being counted as unemployed, you end up dividing 50,000 by 1,000,000 and your unemployment rate is 5%.
Woo Hoo!!! unemployment cut in half! Let's all celebrate and 'reward' whoever is in the White House!
In my example, there are still 100,000 without jobs, the government is just ignoring half of them.
And, in case you don't believe me, simply because I'm a conservative, here is what CBS (hardly a right-wing demagogue) had to say:
The drop in the unemployment rate comes with an asterisk: while there was a 278,000 gain in employment, there was a concurrent labor force decline of 315,000 from October. It would be far preferable for the unemployment rate to drop because the economy is creating over 200,000 per month consistently, rather than due to would-be employees leaving the work force, either because they're retiring or they're simply too discouraged to keep looking for a job. If some of those people resume their job searches, we could see the unemployment rate tick up next month.
source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57335489/november-unemployment-why-the-big-drop/
8.6 percent unemployment is still a very high rate. In fact the jobless rate has remained above 8 percent since February 2009, the longest stretch since monthly records began in 1948. Additionally, there are still 5.7 million long-term unemployed (jobless for 27 weeks and over), which represents 43 percent of the total unemployed and the average duration of unemployment rose to 40.9 weeks, the highest on record.
So let's all bicker/snicker over a Fox News graphic while the policies that keep our friends and neighbors out of work are perpetuated.
posted by MaggieThurber on Dec 13, 2011 at 09:57:00 am #
So instead you post left wing talking points, give me a break you dont have any original thoughts.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 13, 2011 at 10:00:20 am #
Lets see what those number are after their revisions next month and after all the temps are let go after Christmas.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 13, 2011 at 10:00:59 am # 1 person liked this
Now watch as the ToledoTalk TeaTards REFUSE to even acknowledge this thread.
Why acknowledge or participate in your little party when you'll just be your normal self and name call, SHOUT, and throw more feces like a caged monkey?
Eh, what the hell...here's your banana--now start flingin' the poo:
Wow. The end of the world is coming because someone didn't draw the picture right; a picture that was onscreen for probably a whopping total of 10 seconds. Talk about keeping "people whipped up". And, unless my old eyes are fuzzy, it looks like they at the very least got the numbers right (9.0 - 8.6%). But since you think everyone who doesn't agree with you are "tards", you probably think they couldn't read numbers.
As good old SensorG has told me in other threads, the Republic (and the marketplace of ideas) will survive this outrage. Good thing you can rely on unbiased sources like Huffington Post and MediaBistro for your information, right? America--land of freedom and choice!
posted by oldhometown on Dec 13, 2011 at 10:17:50 am # 1 person liked this
MaggieThurber posted at 08:57:00 AM on Dec 13, 2011:
So they made a mistake in the graphic...it's not like no one else has ever done the same thing. As to whether or not it was deliberate, you'd have to know the mind of the person who did the graph, which none of us does. In fact, I'll bet no one can even FIND the name of the person who did the graph.
That being said, shame on them if they didn't issue a correction!
Unlike some, I don't want to defend mistakes like this on the right, simply because they're done by the 'right.' I just wish the 'left' felt the same way about mistakes on their side.
But rather than get into a debate about how terrible one of the media outlets is, or whether 'right' or 'left' is correct, can we look at what the numbers represent? If we all worried less about the 'spin' (from BOTH sides) and more about what the facts mean, we'd all be better off.
First, I don't believe ANY president or administration when it comes to such things anymore. The ONLY reason the rate dropped so significantly is because of the number of people no longer being counted.
For example: when you have 100,000 unemployed and 1,000,000 in the workforce, your unemployment rate is 10%.
If half of that 100,000 are no longer being counted as unemployed, you end up dividing 50,000 by 1,000,000 and your unemployment rate is 5%.
Woo Hoo!!! unemployment cut in half! Let's all celebrate and 'reward' whoever is in the White House!
In my example, there are still 100,000 without jobs, the government is just ignoring half of them.
And, in case you don't believe me, simply because I'm a conservative, here is what CBS (hardly a right-wing demagogue) had to say:
The drop in the unemployment rate comes with an asterisk: while there was a 278,000 gain in employment, there was a concurrent labor force decline of 315,000 from October. It would be far preferable for the unemployment rate to drop because the economy is creating over 200,000 per month consistently, rather than due to would-be employees leaving the work force, either because they're retiring or they're simply too discouraged to keep looking for a job. If some of those people resume their job searches, we could see the unemployment rate tick up next month.
source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57335489/november-unemployment-why-the-big-drop/
8.6 percent unemployment is still a very high rate. In fact the jobless rate has remained above 8 percent since February 2009, the longest stretch since monthly records began in 1948. Additionally, there are still 5.7 million long-term unemployed (jobless for 27 weeks and over), which represents 43 percent of the total unemployed and the average duration of unemployment rose to 40.9 weeks, the highest on record.
So let's all bicker/snicker over a Fox News graphic while the policies that keep our friends and neighbors out of work are perpetuated.
Oh HI MAGS!
Nice of you to drop in and defend Fox News again and say it's "a mistake" and ignore the MANY times they've done similar things to the extent of issuing a "ZERO TOLERANCE" policy for mistakes.
Keep on drinking that TEA.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 11:31:35 am #
Linecrosser posted at 09:00:59 AM on Dec 13, 2011:
Lets see what those number are after their revisions next month and after all the temps are let go after Christmas.
Again with ignoring the fact the graph was drawn to mislead your little Teabagger self. Must be nice to live in Fox News Land where the sky rains blood due to evil socialist Democrats except when Captain Republican comes riding in on his rainbow-farting unicorn powered by the free market to save the day.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 11:36:28 am # 2 people liked this
Let's look at some other Fox News "mistakes"!
http://www.politicususa.com/en/FNC-Lieberman-GOP
http://mediamatters.org/research/200711020007
http://mediamatters.org/research/200807020002
http://mediamatters.org/research/200902100019
I particularly liked the "altered photos" one. Guess Mags wouldn't have a problem if someone 'shopped her photos and ran them, after all, it's an honest mistake!
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 11:44:02 am #
AC - did you stop after the first paragraph? I also said 'shame on them' if they hadn't issued a correction.
You then conveniently ignore the FACT that the issue isn't a graph as much as how the government (under both parties) manipulates these numbers.
But you'd rather attack a conservative WHO AGREED THAT THE GRAPH WAS WRONG AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN CORRECTED, than actually address the problem: that the policies of this president are causing our friends and neighbors to lose their jobs and stay unemployed.
Remind me again - who was it that promised their plan would keep the unemployment rate below 8%?
No, let's just ignore that promise and focus instead on what evil Fox News did with a graph.
posted by MaggieThurber on Dec 13, 2011 at 11:56:59 am # 2 people liked this
I didn't look at the graph, I looked at the numbers. And the numbers dont add up by the way.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:02:19 pm #
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:04:52 pm #
A/C - if the graph was, as you say:
drawn to mislead your little Teabagger self
how is that so many conservatives took issue with the numbers and, basically, ignored the graph?
Yeah - I know that doesn't fit into your nice little perspective, but it's true.
I don't know a single person who even SAW the Fox News graph, while many looked at the numbers and questioned how, without gaining that many jobs, the rate went down.
But you'd rather attack conservatives and Fox News than address the real issue. Would it be so hard for you to admit that a graphic is less important than the actual data?
posted by MaggieThurber on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:20:28 pm #
Wondering....
Maybe this is indicative of the difference in perspective between liberals and conservatives. Liberals get all upset about the picture while conservatives get all upset about the data.
That's what this thread shows.
posted by MaggieThurber on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:27:29 pm # 2 people liked this
Not falling for the "OMG let's question the numbers! IGNORE THE FALSE CHART AND QUESTION THE DATA!" bullshit, Mags and Liney. Unemployment numbers have always underreported, but you'll neatly ignore that fact and probably have no idea what actually goes into the statistics that do get reported.
Of course, with your TeaOP obstructionism it's kind of hard to get things done in Washington right now. Where's that Republican jobs bill anyway?
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 01:11:18 pm #
Not falling for the "OMG let's question the numbers! IGNORE THE FALSE CHART AND QUESTION THE DATA!" bullshit, Mags and Liney. Unemployment numbers have always underreported, but you'll neatly ignore that fact and probably have no idea what actually goes into the statistics that do get reported.
Of course, with your TeaOP obstructionism it's kind of hard to get things done in Washington right now. Where's that Republican jobs bill anyway?
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 01:11:19 pm #
Coward move to the commune already and turn off your electricity. Get a horse and carriage and eat nothing but veggies. Stop working and live off the land. Sit in a circle with yourself and sing Kumbaya. Tell yourself that all will be right with the world if you can only force everyone else to live by your ideals.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 13, 2011 at 01:45:22 pm #
WHERE'S THAT REPUBLICAN JOBS BILL?
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 06:17:09 pm #
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201112130027
From now on, the "57 states" thing is invalid, TeaTards.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:38:08 am #
And media matters is an unbiased news source?
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55:52 am #
Somehow I knew you'd try that, too.
Media Matters is NOT a news source. They don't report on "the news". They monitor the media for and attempt to correct conservative misinformation, such as all the "mistakes" that happen on Fox News.
Would you like to continue with your frantic scrabbling, or can you just admit that Fox News is heavily conservative and deliberately attempts to mislead the public?
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:07:56 pm #
IT is heavily conservative which is why I watch it more than say MSNBC or the other 3 supposed news networks that wont do any real investigative reporting. Between the occasional news that I do catch from the 3 and Fox I can say I get some sense of balance. I dont think they are deliberate any more than you would think the other stations are.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 14, 2011 at 02:49:51 pm #
I'm not Faux News fan but they are no better than Rachel Maddow who ALWAYS looks are things from both angles right?
WHERE'S THAT REPUBLICAN JOBS BILL?
! posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 13, 2011 at 05:17:09 pm # +
They sent them it to the Senate several times. Harry Weed wont put them up for a vote. Should ask where is the budget?
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 14, 2011 at 03:49:51 pm #
Maddow is a liberal, no doubt about that, but she’s no Democrat apologist either. You want to see someone go after Obama? Watch Maddow. Maddow doesn’t have to make up videos or use incorrect graphics to make her point.
My biggest problem with Fox News isn’t that it’s conservative. It’s really nothing but a Republican front. They could care less about conservative ideals, they care about Republican ideals.
That said, liberals on TV/Radio will never be as successful as their conservative counter parts. Liberal just don’t need the constant re-enforcement of their beliefs. We aren’t offended simple because we disagree with someone.
We’re not worried about our marriages failing because we see gays on TV, we’re not worried about daughters becoming raging sluts because they’ve been vaccinated against STDs, we don’t view the words “happy holidays” as a full frontal assault to our religion and we don’t think showing average everyday Muslims on TV as promoting terrorism.
People who believe these things, have to watch FOX. I if they had to face the real world they would go insane.
posted by SensorG on Dec 14, 2011 at 03:51:54 pm # 7 people liked this
My biggest problem with Fox News isn’t that it’s conservative. It’s really nothing but a Republican front. They could care less about conservative ideals, they care about Republican ideals. - Agreed!
posted by dbw8906 on Dec 14, 2011 at 04:20:15 pm # 1 person liked this
posted by toledolen_ on Dec 14, 2011 at 05:41:34 pm # 1 person liked this
Yeah ok bonehead mistakes on air, and your point? Does those mistakes cause people to loose 2.5 million jobs?
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 14, 2011 at 06:59:32 pm #
No, those "mistakes" cause millions of people to vote for Republicans. But you're okay with the rich fucks behind Fox News lying to you in order to further their agenda.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 14, 2011 at 08:35:46 pm #
So mislabeling a state caused someone to vote wrong? Are you saying that people in that state are too stupid to know which state is theirs on a map? Actually that wouldn't surprise me.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 14, 2011 at 10:01:21 pm #
Neatly ignoring all the other "mistakes" posted upthread, aren't you, Liney? Come on, you can do it, say "Fox News deliberately misleads people!"
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 14, 2011 at 11:26:15 pm #
OH LOOK AT TODAY'S FOX NEWS MISTAKE!
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/12/14/look_whos_running_second.html
Nice picture of Romney there.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 14, 2011 at 11:27:19 pm #
Fox News Rupert Murdoch
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/leveson-inquiry/8920729/Charlotte-Church-waived-100000-fee-to-sing-at-Rupert-Murdochs-wedding-in-return-for-good-press.html
Singer Charlotte Church waived a £100,000 fee to sing at Rupert Murdoch's wedding when she was 13, in exchange for a promise of favourable publicity.
I guess I'm just not getting your point at where these things mater all that much or where the evidence of that this was done on purpose.
posted by Linecrosser on Dec 15, 2011 at 03:20:01 am #
"Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."
When there's a repeated history of mistakes that "coincidentally" benefit your agenda and make your enemies look bad, what other conclusion can you draw? PARTICULARLY AFTER they instituted a "zero tolerance policy" for on-air mistakes that includes termination of employment as a penalty. So either this crap is deliberate, or this crap is completely accidental EVERY time and the culture of Fox "News" is such that not even a zero tolerance policy has caused a change in the fact-checking and quality control. And the latter means you can't trust their news to be correct because they have repeatedly shown themselves to not give a damn about getting it right.
Face it, Liney, if the local TV stations made mistakes of the sort that Fox News broadcasts to a national audience, you and half of this board would be on here howling about how awful their production and reporting are and what kind of political agenda they're pushing. If the Blade or the TFP routinely mislabeled Dems as Republicans or vice versa, there'd be a thread on here accusing them of shoddy reporting and political bias. But the fact that you shrug this off when it's the holy FOX NEWS CHANNEL just indicates what sort of hard political bias and ignorance of reality you have.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 15, 2011 at 11:56:04 am #
PIRA
Member since: Dec 11, 2011
What did I do to you and where did you get this little factoid from?
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 15, 2011 at 12:44:26 pm #
posted by toledolen_ on Dec 15, 2011 at 01:12:15 pm #
Does Media Matters have any political leanings? Is there any reason why they would want to attack Fox News? Just asking...
Seems the word "unbiased" is very, very difficult to use these days.
posted by Danneskjold on Dec 15, 2011 at 04:05:41 pm #
AC, you are such a sad little man. I hope you can put aside your anger for a couple days next weekend and celebrate the Christmas holiday. I'll pray for you.
dell_diva posted at 04:52:20 PM on Dec 15, 2011:
AC, you are such a sad little man. I hope you can put aside your anger for a couple days next weekend and celebrate the Christmas holiday. I'll pray for you.
If you can't attack the argument, attack the person putting it forward.
posted by anonymouscoward on Dec 18, 2011 at 10:41:20 pm # 2 people liked this
anonymouscoward posted at 09:41:20 PM on Dec 18, 2011:
dell_diva posted at 04:52:20 PM on Dec 15, 2011:
AC, you are such a sad little man. I hope you can put aside your anger for a couple days next weekend and celebrate the Christmas holiday. I'll pray for you.
If you can't attack the argument, attack the person putting it forward.
Maybe you should call some plays from that playbook now and then.
LOL
posted by toledolen_ on Mar 22, 2012 at 04:40:21 pm #
You might have wanted to do some research before posting that, toledolen_. A quick Google search shows that this is a Photoshopped image that has been circling the web lately.
posted by dell_diva on Mar 22, 2012 at 05:50:30 pm # 2 people liked this
Not to mention the line where it explains the spelling of the city Toulouse, its says near the end, "frenchand" is that a new language?
posted by Linecrosser on Mar 22, 2012 at 06:59:02 pm #
A-C! tea tards? Racist bigoted homophobes? What's next, we're A-holes too? Oh, my.
In my lifetime I can't remember politics being so personal as they are now. And how can you believe anything you hear or read. The extremes have taken over on both ends of the spectrum.
My TV has a remote that changes the channel and that is what I do if I do not like the programing. It also has an off button. And I use both of these when I'm not ready to be listen to either side.
I agree that Rachel Maddow is pretty fair in cutting right to the root of the problem. And she does it for both sides.
Maggie right about this. In any other country if you are out of work you are counted as unemployed. IF you do not get a job out of college you are unemployed. If you quit looking for work you are still unemployed. We fixate on numbers that have been tampered with for decades now.
posted by jackie on Mar 22, 2012 at 08:27:14 pm # 2 people liked this
Still funny.
posted by toledolen_ on Mar 22, 2012 at 08:55:15 pm #
I knew it was fake because Fox would never miss an opportunity to implicate all Muslims in any "terror" related event.
posted by brainswell on Mar 23, 2012 at 10:59:38 am #
Where oh where is Keith Overbite now?
posted by Linecrosser on Mar 31, 2012 at 08:31:04 pm #
Geez, couldn't you TeaTards take one day off? No, instead it's all dancing in the streets over Olbermann being fired. But you were all defending Rush Limbaugh so recently.
Keep fucking that chicken, guys.
posted by anonymouscoward on Apr 01, 2012 at 10:17:57 pm #
I don't get it "toledolen" both graphs look identical to me. I believe the area you've circled is in fact correct. Put your crayons away now, we can all see you have a problem understanding this complicated subject. It may be the color that is throwing you off or possibly because the fox graphic is stretched out a bit wider. In all fairness though, it seem as though most everyone else responding here never really looked at the numbers either. They're the same numbers.
posted by AmericanPie on Apr 01, 2012 at 10:32:56 pm #
AmericanPie posted at 10:32:56 PM on Apr 01, 2012:
I don't get it "toledolen" both graphs look identical to me. I believe the area you've circled is in fact correct. Put your crayons away now, we can all see you have a problem understanding this complicated subject. It may be the color that is throwing you off or possibly because the fox graphic is stretched out a bit wider. In all fairness though, it seem as though most everyone else responding here never really looked at the numbers either. They're the same numbers.
You're trolling, unless you live in an alternate universe where 9.0 and 8.6 are equal numbers and should be plotted at an equal point on a graph even when a point marked 8.6 was plotted lower than 9.0. But don't let math stop you from doing those disgusting things with that chicken.
posted by anonymouscoward on Apr 01, 2012 at 10:54:40 pm # 4 people liked this
LOL
posted by toledolen_ on Apr 02, 2012 at 02:02:07 pm #
Wow that AC guy is full of fury. I am so happy to see lib-tards thrash around about nothing and then come back viciously to anyone who disagrees with him.
So glad I saw the light , got rich and can laugh at all that lib-baloney
posted by rehabilitated on Apr 03, 2012 at 11:53:17 am #
rehabilitated posted at 11:53:17 AM on Apr 03, 2012:
Wow that AC guy is full of fury. I am so happy to see lib-tards thrash around about nothing and then come back viciously to anyone who disagrees with him.
So glad I saw the light , got rich and can laugh at all that lib-baloney
Funny how much outrage there was over me using the "tard" word but when someone else does it, it's fine.
Nice double-standard on this site.
posted by anonymouscoward on Apr 03, 2012 at 03:10:35 pm # 1 person liked this
There are none so blind as those who will not see
posted by rehabilitated on Apr 03, 2012 at 03:37:52 pm #
Login or create an account to post a comment.