/p/
Toledo Talk forums search sign-up login

UAW will own 55% of Chrysler

The UAW announced late Wednesday night that its membership at Chrysler had overwhelmingly ratified the agreement reached between the company and union leadership on Sunday night.

As a result of that deal, the UAW will own 55% of Chrysler. Fiat will own a 20% stake with the option of increasing it to 35%. The U.S. government will own 8% and Canada will have a 2% stake.

created by justareviewer on Apr 30, 2009 at 04:57:37 pm     Comments: 21

source      versions

Comments ... #

On the whole, unions have not done well owning companies. I doubt this one will survive more than five years.

posted by oldsendbrdy on Apr 30, 2009 at 05:12:22 pm     #  

This will be interesting...

posted by WalterAnthony on Apr 30, 2009 at 06:17:58 pm     #  

If the workers think they had it bad under Chrysler-wait until their steward becomes their boss. They're about to find out what "get to work" means!

posted by Wulf on Apr 30, 2009 at 07:00:48 pm     #  

This will be interesting. It's one thing to negotiate against the "man". What do you do when you ARE the man?

posted by MoreThanRhetoric on Apr 30, 2009 at 07:27:27 pm     #  

Hope it works out. This region cannot afford to see the demise of the Big Three.

posted by bikerdude on Apr 30, 2009 at 07:40:08 pm     #  

So, it looks like the union is gone? The company is the union? Who represents the workers?

posted by Wulf on Apr 30, 2009 at 08:13:23 pm     #  

Good point Wulf. How do you negotiate when you own >51% of a company, you are the company.

Let me see, I bring to the floor an agreement to give the workers (cough us) a $75/hr raise. Everyone say I.

55% say I, motion carried. We all now make more than the CEO sweeping floors, and by the way. You're all laid off in 6 months as the company will be going out of bankrupt. Thank goodness I added a subsection where each worker get's 100k-110k to take "early retirement"

-----

I try very hard to see both sides, but when it comes to this stuff it just frustrates me.

posted by INeedCoffee on Apr 30, 2009 at 08:28:57 pm     #  

I was burned by Chrystler pretty bad so if they fail I'll be happy. You can't charge someone 1.5x (not including interest) for the sticker, force them to buy a 3k "bumper to bumper" warranty (claiming the bank was requesting it), then when the engine dies say "oh btw you're car is now worth about $500, sorry if you still owe 12k on it" Oh it's only a year old and you still have 2 years on your warranty? Sorry there's a clause that says the warranty will only pay up to the value of the car, in this case $500.

It wasn't totaled so insurance couldn't kick in, and since it wasn't an insured issue, gap insurance doesn't kick in.

All because of an known issue. Anyone with a 2.7 liter Crystler engine who's had it blown up knows what I'm talking about.

Venting done, sorry.

posted by INeedCoffee on Apr 30, 2009 at 08:33:11 pm     #  

I like bicycles.

posted by toledolen on Apr 30, 2009 at 09:21:01 pm     #  

If the union bosses are now the shop bosses, the workers are flat out going to be "put to work", as they say on the shop floor.

posted by Wulf on Apr 30, 2009 at 09:22:42 pm     #  

Curious Wulf, have you ever worked in an auto factory?

posted by JeepMaker on May 01, 2009 at 12:50:36 am     #  

I used to.

posted by Wulf on May 01, 2009 at 08:55:59 am     #  

Wulf ,if you used to work in an auto plant and the workers there make so much money for doing nothing as you say, then why did you quit?

posted by buckeye278 on May 01, 2009 at 09:18:00 am     #  

Where did you get THAT from-doing nothing?

posted by Wulf on May 01, 2009 at 09:40:29 am     #  

When you said they would be "put to work".I quess I thought you meant that they were not working and that they would be "put to work" if the union stewards were going to be their bosses.

posted by buckeye278 on May 01, 2009 at 10:10:34 am     #  

It means when you bitch about something on the floor, you might moved to a worse job the next day.

posted by Wulf on May 01, 2009 at 11:10:44 am     #  

Where, when, and for how long?

posted by JeepMaker on May 01, 2009 at 11:38:58 am     #  

I did LOL this morning when I heard Gettlefinger say on CBS....to the extent of....."this union has done a lot to prevent this bankruptcy from happening". Here is some advice Ron....just let that dog sleep.

posted by weakskd on May 01, 2009 at 11:55:28 am     #  

This is the first move toward socializing the auto industry. Obama's biggest roadblock was the unions. Making them part of the procedure will effectively remove that roadblock and clear the way for breaking unions altogether, while preserving his political base in the boardrooms. The rich get richer, the worker gets the driveshaft.

posted by max on May 01, 2009 at 04:55:29 pm     #  

To INeedCoffee:

You weren't burned by Chrysler insomuch as you were burned by the dealer. If YOU signed papers for an overpriced car, and YOU signed papers for a warranty that the bank requested (not legal, it's called packing payments), and YOU knowingly purchased a vehicle with a 2.7l Chrysler engine (which most finance companied won't write loans on anymore), then YOU are just as much at fault as the dealer who did in fact rip you off. Know what you are signing before you sign it.

I know what I'm talking about. I'm a finance manager for a car dealership.

posted by muddyriverduck on May 01, 2009 at 08:54:51 pm     #  

muddy: I agree partially with what you said. Unfortunately for me the car is not in my name. My dad signed/cosigned the loan and paperwork so I could get the car I didnt get a say other than "I need a work for car, I'll pay for it if you can help me co-sign".

Regardless, what you said is true, and since then I do my research and make sure to ask a lot of questions before I or someone on my behalf adds to my debt.

Though I still blame the dealership. The car was listed as $6k on the lot, by the time dad signed it was 12k, w/ about 17-18k after interest. (2k of which was the bumper to bumper warranty).

If you say it's bumper to bumper it's bumper to bumper. Let's face it, having any clause that says "we will pay up to the value of X" you have pretty much made a loophole to never pay for anything serious. Because if anything serious breaks then the car is essentially worth nothing but salvage. I dont see how that can be legal, but again shows how a person needs to read the fine print.

They reason they say the car cost 12k instead of 6k was "because the bank wouldnt sign a loan for that amount and needed the car to be higher" Huh?!

I also asked the bank later and they said they never required that I have the extended warranty so the salesman was down right lying about that.

Any I found contact info for the Lawyer doing the Class action lawsuit so who knows what will come of it.

posted by INeedCoffee on May 02, 2009 at 06:46:09 pm     #  

Login or create an account to post a comment.