/p/
Toledo Talk forums search sign-up login

The Van Jones Non Feeding Frenzy

If you don't find this suspicious (of the MSM), then your koolaid is working.

http://bit.ly/Qn3fq

The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
09/04/09 11:30 AM EDT

From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?" If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?" And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history.

created by Ahuvia on Sep 04, 2009 at 09:36:38 pm     Media     Comments: 17

source      versions

Comments ... #

Everyday the evidence of this guy's racism and radicalism just keeps piling up. Yet the Whitehouse denies it (or ignores). This one below is only the latest to surface on this jerk.

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 04, 2009 at 09:39:24 pm     #  

I don't know what the problem is here. Apologize, a nutjob got through. Make him resign and move on. Weren't we promised a greater level of responsibility and accountability in Washington by this President?

I mean, I understand that silly things like tax evasion must be ignored to get the best people in charge of the economy and all, but come on!

What possible purpose does it serve to keep this racist pro-cop killer conspiracy whackjob in office?

How exactly does promoting a nut who calls the political opposition A-holes help create a new tone in politics and in Washington as this President promised?

The president wants us to judge him by the company he keeps (his words). Well, what does Czar Jones say about President Obama?

posted by taliesin52 on Sep 05, 2009 at 06:12:00 am     #  

I don't know what the problem is here. Apologize, a nutjob got through. Make him resign and move on.

Might be a bit tougher than "whoops, didnt catch that" There have been way too many statements out there made by the Obamas about how long they've known and have been friends with Jones.

Like you said - Obama has said to judge him by the company he keeps.

posted by billy on Sep 05, 2009 at 08:10:49 am     #  

I am generally a supporter of the President, but he needs to dump this guy. There is an avalanche of embarrassing items on Van Jones, from signing on to a 9/11 truther letter to leading protests against the jailing of Mumia Abu Jamal (convicted of killing a white Philly cop in '81). This guy is in charge of green jobs or something, shouldn't be hard to replace. Obama doesn't need to add any fuel the wingnuts fears....

posted by Ace_Face on Sep 05, 2009 at 12:26:41 pm     #  

"whoops, didnt catch that" !!!

posted by toledolen on Sep 05, 2009 at 01:07:49 pm     #  

I'm not sure of the rest of Van Jones' controversies, but signing on to the 'truther letter" should be the least of them. Would anyone with half a brain who had actually read that letter have been more than happy to sign it? These basic and fundamental questions were never properly answered, and what is wrong with asking them? Please read the statement before passing judgement. Here is the text of the supposed "truther letter". Perhaps it would be more fittingly titled, 'All American Common Sense Questions".

From the www.911truth.org website http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20090904181706887

We Want Real Answers About 9/11

On August 31, 2004, Zogby International, the official North American political polling agency for Reuters, released a poll that found nearly half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of those in New York state believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9/11 attacks and "consciously failed" to act. Of the New York City residents, 66% called for a new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or the New York Attorney General.

In connection with this news, we have assembled 100 notable Americans and 40 family members of those who died to sign this 9/11 Statement, which calls for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.

We want truthful answers to questions such as:

1.Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?
2.Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?
3.Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?
4.Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?
5.Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?
6.Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge?
7.How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA's radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military?
8.How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent?
9.What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state?
10.Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers?
11.Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here?
12.Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice?
Those who are demanding deeper inquiry now number in the hundreds of thousands, including a former member of the first Bush administration, a retired Air Force colonel, a European parliamentarian, families of the victims, highly respected authors, investigative journalists, peace and justice leaders, former Pentagon staff, and the National Green Party.

As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

1.An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
2.Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
3.Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
4.The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry.
Given the importance of the coming election, we feel it is imperative that these questions be addressed publicly, honestly, and rigorously so that Americans may exercise their democratic rights with full awareness.

P.S. A goodly number of the signatories are Republicans and Independents, as well as Democrats.

posted by Bbcmjeep43 on Sep 05, 2009 at 05:40:48 pm     #  

I'm sorry, but what's the problem with Van Jones?

posted by pink_slip on Sep 05, 2009 at 07:42:15 pm     #  

<i>I'm sorry, but what's the problem with Van Jones?</i>

He's leading the charge against Glenn Beck's sponsors.

posted by SensorG on Sep 05, 2009 at 08:38:22 pm     #  

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 06, 2009 at 07:32:02 am     #  

Van "Psycho" Jones Resigns!

Thank you President Obama.

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 06, 2009 at 07:35:18 am     #  

"Espousing communism"? Unless I missed it, he never even says the word "communism"

posted by pink_slip on Sep 06, 2009 at 09:47:48 am     #  

You miss a lot.

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 06, 2009 at 12:55:33 pm     #  

Can you point it out for me?

posted by pink_slip on Sep 06, 2009 at 01:08:01 pm     #  

No. I also didn't title the video nitpicker. You missed the point. If you can't admit that you've already and read up on how this guy ADMITTED he became a Communist, then what's the point?

This video is just another example of Van Jone's far far left views. He's a kook. Admit it. If you don't, then admit you are one too.

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 06, 2009 at 01:35:17 pm     #  

I really didn't see anything wrong with the video. Certainly nothing incendiary. Besides, he said he WAS a communist. Just like Reagan used to be a strong advocate for unions

posted by pink_slip on Sep 06, 2009 at 01:43:00 pm     #  

Yeah, Van Jones changed. Umm hmm. Sure.

posted by Ahuvia on Sep 06, 2009 at 01:50:23 pm     #  

Hi Sillywabbit, you have been missed.

Sorry to see that over the gorgeous holiday weekend you found compelled to start spewing your hatred under another username. Do you really think ONE person is going to read your posts and not laugh? Meanwhile, calmer anti-racist people were cooking out, swimming, boating, spending time with family and friends and the like. You may want to look into that.

Kisses.

posted by Ryan on Sep 07, 2009 at 06:59:31 pm     #  

Login or create an account to post a comment.