/p/
Toledo Talk forums search sign-up login
Intro
Education
Budget
Business and Economic Development
City Beautification
City Government
Police
Infrastructure
Vacant Property
Refuse Collection

Karen Shanahan's White Paper on fixing Toledo

Sep 18, 2007 posting at Karen Shanahan's blog.

After 2 years of campaigning, some of the issues facing Toledo have become very clear and the resistance to deal with the issues by elected officials is often driven by a concern they may lose the backing of the unions and city employees.

The last election highlighted the reality of this as the electorate did not vote. Those elected won by connections in the political and union arena, not by issues, so to survive as an elected official, there is logic in appeasing the political party and unions.

However, this is not to the benefit of Toledoans and we need elected officials to work for the good of the city not the good of the unions.

I'll bullet-point some of Shanahan's statements. Access her blog posting for her complete list and for details.

Intro

  • We need a good school system but we don’t have one. The chokehold TFT (Toledo Federation of Teachers) has on the system inhibits creative, flexible and innovative programs.
  • Residents of Toledo do not need to pay more taxes; we need to realign the employee compensation to reflect the market.
  • It is time to stop manipulating business opportunities to further political agendas.
  • Our community would be in a much better position if we approached the business of the City of Toledo as a business. The residents are the customers of City Government and we are not treated very well.

Education

  • Embrace charter schools and the voucher program, it is offering a much-needed alternative to a failing public school system and can be instrumental in retaining and recruiting families to Toledo.
  • Send out a blind survey and ask the 60% of teachers and administrators of TPS why they don’t live in Toledo and also to those who do live in Toledo but send their children to private schools.

Budget

  • Balance the budget by looking inward for cost savings not outward for more revenue.
  • Effective Jan. 1, 2008, all city employees would contribute $100 per month towards their medical coverage and $20 co-pay for office visits and prescriptions.

Business and Economic Development

  • Stop bundling groups of legitimate businesses to vilify (i.e., convenience stores).
  • Review the cost and frequency of inspections. They may increase city revenue, but at what cost to small business.
  • Create a complete list of all yearly inspections and the inspection costs to determine whether they are necessary. Those identified as frivolous and designed primarily to increase revenue should be eliminated.
  • Bundle into one package all costs and permits required to establish a new business.
  • Eliminate the living wage law in Toledo.

City Beautification

  • Seek more volunteer organizations to handle the beautification projects.

City Government

  • Reduce the size of council.
  • Answer emails and phone calls.
  • If a program is going to change, consider the programs a contract with the residents and give at least 30 days proper notification before implementation.

Police

  • The police department could use some realigning.
  • Create a relationship with Owens Community College to offer a degree which would prepare students to be employed by TPD after graduation so the “police class” could be cut from one year to 3 months.
  • What are the 292 policemen duties?
  • In the morning and evening, position a police car at a school for 15 minutes during the busiest time and have the lights flashing.

Infrastructure

  • Create a web-based list of all repair requests for streets, potholes, and complaints which can easily be accessed by residents.
    • It could be a free Google spreadsheet with a link on the City Web Page.
    • The list should be prioritized by severity, listing: location, type of call, date of call, date of expected repair, estimated cost of repair and completion date.

Vacant Property

  • The city has ownership of hundreds of residential properties with 30’ frontage primarily in the central city.
    • They all must be maintained by the city.
    • It drains our resources.
    • Have a fire sale; offer each property to any buyer for $1.00.

Refuse Collection

  • Continue the [unlimited trash] program, we already pay for it.
  • Educate the residents on the recycle program and be consistent.
  • Return trash pickup to the alleys.
  • When the ¾% temporary tax was passed, it was to include an incinerator. With the issue of landfills, recycling and energy, it is time to revisit the possibility of an incinerator. A committee should immediately begin researching the latest technology of refuse incineration.
created by jr on Sep 19, 2007 at 12:18:49 pm     Comments: 8

source      versions      1 person liked this

tags: politics   Toledo   

Related articles
Toledo Mayor Carty Finkbeiner Snubs Toledo Express Airport Again - Jun 18, 2009
Moronic: Toledo Fire Department proposed fees - Apr 21, 2009
Toledo suburb Oregon does not want TARTA - Apr 07, 2010
Toledo Budget 2007 - Nov 14, 2007
Carty will not seek re-election - Jul 13, 2009
more >>

Comments ... #

Our community would be in a much better position if we approached the business of the City of Toledo as a business...I disagree. Government is not structured to run like a business.

posted by justareviewer on Sep 19, 2007 at 07:52:27 pm     #  

Just because government is not structured to run like a business doesn't mean it can't benefit from being more 'business-like', especially in terms of customer service, efficiency and focus on the core responsibilities...

I've always liked Karen as I thought she has a lot of common sense...I like many of her suggestions.

posted by MaggieThurber on Sep 19, 2007 at 08:20:32 pm     #  

Didn't the city have a "homesteading" provision maybe a couple of decades ago. I seem to remember people could get a run-down property, put "sweat" equity into it, and then they would have the deed after a few years. But under that option they would have to show progress. If properties were sold for a $1.00 would the city be able to enforce the building codes they now enforce against landlords for puting "substandard" properties up for rent. Why would the Westhaven Group got into trouble when someone is suggesting the city do the same thing?

posted by oldsendbrdy on Sep 19, 2007 at 08:29:34 pm     #  

The Brookings Institute report makes a very strong case, jobs, clean air and a vibrant waterfront and tourist buisnees, if we move away from the rustbelt industries that have been the destruction of Toledo.
Otherwise nothing will change here, except that it will get worse.

posted by prime3end on Feb 24, 2008 at 01:14:49 pm     #  

Comment to the Lucas County in 2050 article, which is related to the 21st Century Government Committee proposal.

prime3end's Oct 26, 2006 Toledo Talk posting that pointed to the Brookings Institute's report (2.4 meg pdf file).

This is a 52 page report from the Brookings Institute, it details that Toledo and the 10 states around the great lakes should move away from rust belt thinking and embrace a technology and Lake based tourist and fisheries economy.

Related Blade articles, Oct 27, 2006 story

An example of the regionalism approach exists in the Southern Growth Policies Board in Research Triangle Park, N.C. It represents 13 states and the commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The groundwork for it was laid in 1971. It will be tough, but diehard Buckeye and Wolverine fans must set aside their sports loyalty in favor of regional cooperation.

Oct 23, 2006 Blade story titled Leaders urged to unite for growth; 12-state blueprint targets economy


And apparently a newer Brookings report exists that was posted by prime3end in September 2007. At HealthyLakes.org :
$50 Billion in Economic Benefit Hinge on Restoration of Great Lakes

  • Cost to restore and protect the Great Lakes: $26 Billion.
  • Cost of creating sustainable economic growth and reviving the industrial heartland of America: Priceless.

From the Great Lakes Wiki - Areas of Concern

Enlarge image

posted by jr on Feb 24, 2008 at 04:06:04 pm     #  

Mar 24, 2008 Toledo Blade op-ed titled Keeping Toledo clean which naturally supports continuation of the possibly illegal city tax applied a year ago.


Mar 24, 2008 Karen Shanahan blog posting titled Refuse Fee - 2% of the General Budget which is a response to the Blade's endorsement of the possibly illegal city tax :

I'm amazed at the time and attention given the "Refuse Fee". For a fee which generates only 2% of the Revenue for the General Fund of the budget, it seems to be receiving 75% of the energy the Council, Administration and Blade coverage of the budget. We hear virtually nothing of any plans to reduce spending, freeze wages, require 8 hours work for 8 hours pay... it's just "give me more money" through the refuse "fee". Why not? After all, it's a cash cow for the city as there are no restrictions on how high they can raise the fee to generate revenue to pay for exorbitant expenditures. For the 4.9 million in projected revenue, Council could do an across the board cut of .09% over the $545 million budget rather than push this unnecessary fee.

I have this to offer regarding the Blade editorial:

"The Blade position regarding the city budget is curious given the fact they shut out their employees just recently to force concessions on wages, benefits, employee hours, etc. Not only did the Blade receive numerous concessions, they did so without affecting service. Why doesn’t the Blade as vigorously advocate for the taxpayers by holding the Administration and Council to the same standards and demand similar concessions. Could the Blade remain viable with 28% retirement payments, 0 in medical benefit copay, employees working 4 hours a day though paid for 8 hours, 15 paid holidays, etc.? I doubt it! But then, it is much easier to spend the money of others. This continued position of tax and spend on the part of the Blade is both disappointing and irresponsible as these contracts are crippling the city."

posted by jr on Mar 25, 2008 at 02:12:52 pm     #  

Toledo needs to bridge the old era of successes to the new generation of ideas! Like Carney.. I can't wait for the TRANSFORMATION of TOLEDO!

posted by alexrolfe on Jan 13, 2009 at 08:21:27 pm     #  

Could it be true that so many Toledo Public School Teachers send their children to schools to other schools.
If you want to work for Toledo, then I think you should invest in Toledo via living in Toledo, sending your children to Toledo Public,and so on. I am against Charter schools. Again, I believe if we want our Public Schools to be top-notch, then we have to invest in them.

posted by nottoworry on Feb 27, 2009 at 01:44:05 pm     #  

Login or create an account to post a comment.